Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 1:10:30 GMT -5
One Year Last Wednesday (/) with a Positive Balance. According to Data Collected by the Economics Department of the Housing Union (Secovi) of São Paulo, Eviction Actions Fell by Up to % Compared to the Previous Year, as Recorded in June , at the São Paulo Court of Justice. in June , for Example, , Eviction Actions Reached the São Paulo Court of Justice. a Year Later, with the New Wording of the Tenancy Law, This Number Fell to Thousand. “Even Though Last Year We Registered a Four-Month Forensic Strike [Which Began in April and Lasted Days] , the Process Became More Intelligent”, Explains Lawyer Jaques Bushatsky , Director of Tenancy Legislation at Secovi. the Process Is What He Calls an “Improvement” of Law ,, of
Lawyer Says, Before the New Wording of the Tenancy Law, When an Owner Wanted to Recover His Property, He Had to Wait to Months. the Period Ranged from the Filing of the Action Until the Truck Stopped in Front of the Property Ready to Collect the Tenant's Bags. What Law , Did Was Speed Up Eviction Actions Due to Default. If Previously the Tenant Had Up to Three Years to Delay Handing Over the Property, Now He Has Days. the Result, Explains Bushatsky, Is That “The Tenant, Knowing That the Action Is No Longer Dragging on Like Before, Quickly Rushes to Make an Agreement”. with the Austria Phone Numbers List Modification of Article of the Legislation, the Eviction Order, on a Preliminary Basis, Began to Be Granted Within Days. and the Tenant, Who Previously Had Six Months to Leave the Premises, Must Leave the Property Within a Maximum of Days, as Determined by Article of the New Law. It Is Precisely This Point That Daniel Alcântara Nastri Cerveira , from the Firm Cervellas, Dornellas E Advogados Associados, Questions.
When Commenting on the Impact of the New Law in the Case of Commercial Properties, He Reflects on Who Would Truly Benefit from It. “Considering the Difficulties in Finding a New Commercial Location, in Addition to All the Circumstances Surrounding the Closure of an Operation in a Given Location, It Becomes, at the Very Least, Debatable Whether the Reduction of the Deadline Was Beneficial to Society or Whether It Merely Observed the Interests of Landlords,” He Says. for Him, However, the Understanding of When the Tenant Should Leave the Property — Whether Before or After the Action Becomes Final — Is Not Yet Pacified. “One Year Is Not Enough to Understand What Direction This Will Take. It Is Necessary to Strengthen Jurisprudence on This Point”, He Says. Cerveira Emphasizes That the New Tenancy Law, by Ratifying an Understanding That Already Existed and by Adapting the Wording to the Civil Code, Brought Commendable Changes.
Lawyer Says, Before the New Wording of the Tenancy Law, When an Owner Wanted to Recover His Property, He Had to Wait to Months. the Period Ranged from the Filing of the Action Until the Truck Stopped in Front of the Property Ready to Collect the Tenant's Bags. What Law , Did Was Speed Up Eviction Actions Due to Default. If Previously the Tenant Had Up to Three Years to Delay Handing Over the Property, Now He Has Days. the Result, Explains Bushatsky, Is That “The Tenant, Knowing That the Action Is No Longer Dragging on Like Before, Quickly Rushes to Make an Agreement”. with the Austria Phone Numbers List Modification of Article of the Legislation, the Eviction Order, on a Preliminary Basis, Began to Be Granted Within Days. and the Tenant, Who Previously Had Six Months to Leave the Premises, Must Leave the Property Within a Maximum of Days, as Determined by Article of the New Law. It Is Precisely This Point That Daniel Alcântara Nastri Cerveira , from the Firm Cervellas, Dornellas E Advogados Associados, Questions.
When Commenting on the Impact of the New Law in the Case of Commercial Properties, He Reflects on Who Would Truly Benefit from It. “Considering the Difficulties in Finding a New Commercial Location, in Addition to All the Circumstances Surrounding the Closure of an Operation in a Given Location, It Becomes, at the Very Least, Debatable Whether the Reduction of the Deadline Was Beneficial to Society or Whether It Merely Observed the Interests of Landlords,” He Says. for Him, However, the Understanding of When the Tenant Should Leave the Property — Whether Before or After the Action Becomes Final — Is Not Yet Pacified. “One Year Is Not Enough to Understand What Direction This Will Take. It Is Necessary to Strengthen Jurisprudence on This Point”, He Says. Cerveira Emphasizes That the New Tenancy Law, by Ratifying an Understanding That Already Existed and by Adapting the Wording to the Civil Code, Brought Commendable Changes.